|

Marlborough Police Department receives K-9 grant

By Joan F. Simoneau, Contributing Writer

Marlborough large web iconMarlborough – The Marlborough Police Department has been awarded a $25,000 grant by the Stanton Foundation that will help launch the city's first K-9 program. City Councilors accepted the grant at the request of Mayor Arthur Vigeant during their July 8 meeting.

“As we discussed during the [fiscal year 2014]? budget process, this program will be a valuable tool that will assist our police department in apprehensions, investigations and seizures,” said Vigeant in his communication to the council. “I want to thank Chief [Mark] Leonard for his dogged pursuit of this grant as well as the Stanton Foundation for funding this worthy request.”

No additional personnel will be added, according to Leonard. He said special training will begin at the Boston Police Canine Academy for all members of the police force. Also planned are the purchase of a dog, equipment, and a vehicle from which to operate. Presently, the local department is using dogs from the State Police and Sheriff's department.

Following active implementation of the program, the city will provide quarterly reports to the Stanton Foundation, which is a private organization. Marlborough is one of the first communities to apply for and receive this grant.

Short URL: http://communityadvocate.com/?p=37820

Posted by on Jul 11 2013. Filed under Byline Stories, Marlborough, This Just In. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0. You can leave a response or trackback to this entry

Leave a Reply


six - = 5

Recently Commented

  • denise ward: Do you know that it is a right to drive on the roads without a license or registration? Yes, it was...
  • Gerard Bourque: One correction: Although listed on the program, the USMC JROTC unit from Assabet Regional Technical...
  • Karen Porter O'Connell: Great seeing the photos of my old hometown. Only one I know is Bruce Goldsmith.
  • Community Advocate Staff: Thank you for noting that. We have made the correction.
  • Tom: Brian was 28, not 24.