|

Vote against Shrewsbury override – Pohl

To the Editor:

Regarding the Proposition? 2-1/2 override in Shrewsbury, an open letter to the town of Shrewsbury and the political group called “Community Supporters for Shrewsbury. ”

While I agree that the town has deep financial problems, I need to ask myself, WHY( ?), and how we got here. I am not a follower of politics, nor a financial expert, but it occurs to me that all this is the result of bad planning.

When I say “bad planning,” I's thinking of the new library, the high school built in the middle of nowhere (that resembles a 5 star Hilton) and a huge fire truck that needed a new building.

All of those were “special interest groups” without regard to basic town needs.

I am going to be voting “NO”‘ on Proposition? 2-1/2, not because the kids don’t need updated school books, but because the town fathers need to be responsible for bad planning, and a “no” vote would put them into a corner for their actions.

The town needs to hire an independent, responsible, financial adviser, and trade that fire engine for school books.

Stephen Pohl

Shrewsbury

 

Short URL: http://communityadvocate.com/?p=49478

Posted by on May 24 2014. Filed under Byline Stories, Editorially Speaking, Shrewsbury. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0. You can leave a response or trackback to this entry

Leave a Reply


* 7 = sixty three

Recently Commented

  • Thomas Petit: Hi Janet, I am doing research on Richard Bernon Downey who was also a gunner with VT-14 in 1944 and...
  • Larry: It’s awesome how schools today are embracing innovation by investing and building studios that helps...
  • concerned northboroite: Where is the outrage? Not ONE selectman has come forward to support and investigate avenues...
  • Linda: Why don’t they lower the price tag so someone can afford to buy it and rehab it. Better than demolishing...
  • ?: how is a demolition application help save the white cliffs? Isn’t that just moving the process along...